![]() The FBI and the CIA were willing to do their bidding, operating in secret to spy on and undermine the President. They didn’t seize the Capitol because they didn’t have to. While Washington and the press focus on January 6, the more dangerous and anti-democratic acts occurred in the shadows in 20. That would confirm the data Sussmann and Joffe passed to the CIA was from the Trump transition period. ![]() Then our friend Margot Cleveland reviewed a Durham filing in the Sussmann case from Octoand put it all together: ![]() If Sussmann’s attorney is telling the truth (never a given), then we suspect the Executive Office of the President data included that from the 74 day the Trump transition period (between the Novemelection and the Januinauguration) – which would still be spying on the incoming Trump Administration. After Sussmann’s attorney responded to the Durham filing, stating that Sussmann provided the CIA with Executive Office of the President data from “when Barack Obama was president,” we theorized that this data was from the transition period because that’s when there would be access to Trump’s team: We don’t have the answers – yet.īut there is an answer we do have. What did the CIA do with that information?ĭid the CIA pass it to the FBI, allowing Joffe to theoretically keep his hands clean and his identity unknown?Īll good questions. So desperate, in fact, that they were providing manipulated data to the federal government to further false Trump/Russia conspiracies.Īnd consider whether Sussmann took this information to the CIA on behalf of a type of “whistleblower,” allowing Joffe to remain nameless. It is accurate to say that they were desperate to prove Trump’s links to Russia. Or, perhaps Sussmann and Joffe wanted to spur additional intelligence community investigations into Trump. It’s why James Comey leaked classified memos through his lawyer, why there were leaks against Flynn in early January 2017, and why Kevin Clinesmith falsified a CIA e-mail so that the FISA warrants against Carter Page could continue. It’s within the realm of possibilities that they wanted to continue to damage Trump, as this was the general goal of the political and bureaucratic establishment during the Trump years – especially in the early period, when Trump’s political power and his ability to implement his agenda would be at its height. After all, the bogus story of a secret Alfa Bank/Trump Organization back-channel made it to Slate via Franklin Foer on Octo– just before the Novempresidential election, and not long after Sussmann went to the FBI to relay these same allegations.īut why continue to push a Trump/Russia hoax in February 2017? One could theorize that they made the Trump/Russia connection in the summer and fall of 2016 to hurt Trump politically. We also asked why Joffe and Sussmann continued to push false allegations of Trump’s ties to Russia after the election. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |